Method of determining a radius of a cutting end of a tool for a turning machine

ABSTRACT

A method of determining a radius of a cutting end of a tool for a turning machine using a touch probe is provided. One of the cutting end and the touch probe is movable relative to a reference frame having a first axis and a second axis and having a reference point trackable in the reference frame. The method comprises establishing a first contact point and recording a first coordinate of the reference point on the first axis; establishing a second contact point and recording a second coordinate of the reference point on the second axis; establishing a third contact point and recording a third coordinate of the reference point on the first axis and a fourth coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon contact; and determining a radius of the cutting end based on the first, second, third and fourth coordinates.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,618,927 filed on Apr. 15, 2014, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The application relates generally to methods of determining radii of tools, and more specifically of tools for turning machines.

BACKGROUND OF THE ART

Turning machines, such as in-turn, mill-turn, and lathes, CNC use tools to carve channels or sections in a rotating part. The tools include a cutting end which, as sharp as it may be, has a rounded portion at its tip. The positioning of the cutting end of the tool determines a position of the channel or section to be removed. In some application, the position of the tool may be required with greater precision before the tool is used. In order to determine the position of the tool, probes, for example mechanical or optical, may be used.

Touch probes typically contact the tool at various locations to determine a position of the tool's cutting end in a plane. A radius of the cutting end's rounded portion is based on nominal values given by the manufacturer of the tool. The nominal values may not correspond enough to the actual radius of the cutting end which could lead to imprecise cutting.

Optical sensors such as laser beam detectors can be used to scan the cutting end of the tool in order to determine its radius. The optical methods are however calculation intensive, and can be sensitive to noise coming from chips of material or thin layers of fluids.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, there is provided a method of determining a radius of a cutting end of a tool for a turning machine using a touch probe, one of the cutting end and the touch probe being movable relative to a reference frame having a first axis and a second axis, the one of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe having a reference point trackable in the reference frame, the method comprising: a) establishing a first contact point between the touch probe and the cutting end and recording a first coordinate of the reference point on the first axis, the first contact point having a known coordinate on the first axis; and b) establishing a second contact point between the touch probe and the cutting end and recording a second coordinate of the reference point on the second axis, the second contact point having a known coordinate on the second axis; and c) establishing a third contact point between the touch probe and the cutting end by moving an end point of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe along a predetermined direction at an angle with the first and second axes and recording a third coordinate of the reference point on the first axis and a fourth coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon contact, the pre-determined direction being dependent on the coordinate of the first contact point on the first axis and the coordinate of the second contact point on the second axis, the end point being offset from the reference point by an amount deduced from the first coordinate and the second coordinate recorded at steps a) and b); and d) determining a radius of the cutting end based on the first, second, third and fourth coordinates.

In another aspect, there is provided a method of determining a radius of a cutting end of a tool for a turning machine using a touch probe, one of the cutting end and the touch probe being movable relative to a reference frame having a first axis and a second axis, the one of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe having a reference point trackable in the reference frame, the method comprising: a) recording a first coordinate of the reference point on the first axis upon contacting the touch probe and the cutting end at a first contact point having a known coordinate on the first axis; b) calculating a first offset of an end point of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe relative to the reference point on the first axis based on the first coordinate; c) recording a second coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon contacting the touch probe and the cutting end at a second contact point having a known coordinate on the second axis; and d) calculating a second offset of the end point relative to the reference point on the second axis based on the second coordinate; e) recording a third coordinate of the reference point on the first axis and a fourth coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon moving an end point of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe along a predetermined direction and contacting the touch probe and the cutting end at a third contact point along the predetermined direction, the third contact point having known coordinates on the first and second axes, the predetermined direction being at an angle with the first and second axes and being determined from the coordinate of the first contact point on the first axis and the coordinate of the second contact point on the second axis, the end point calculated using the first and second offsets; and f) determining a radius of the cutting end based on the first, second, third and fourth coordinates.

In yet another aspect, there is provided a turning machine comprising: a tool having a cutting end; a touch probe having two flat faces and one of a rounded and angled corner joining the two flat faces; and an electronic control unit (ECU) controlling the one of the tool and the probe to move in a reference frame to establish separate contacts between the probe and the tool at a first point on one of the two flat faces, at a second point on the other one of the two flat faces and at a third point on the one of the rounded and angled corner, the ECU being configured to record coordinates of a reference point of the one of the tool and the probe during the separate contacts so as to calculate a radius of the cutting end.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a tool for a turning machine;

FIG. 2a is a schematic top plan view of a touch probe according to a first embodiment;

FIG. 2b is a schematic top plan view of a touch probe according to a second embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a first position relative to each other;

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a second position relative to each other;

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a third position relative to each other;

FIG. 6 is a schematic view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a fourth position relative to each other;

FIG. 7a is a close-up view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a fifth position relative to each other;

FIG. 7b is a close-up view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in the fourth position relative to each other shown in FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 is a flow chart of a method of determining a radius of the tool of FIG. 1 using any one of the touch probes of FIG. 2a or 2 b; and

FIG. 9 is a close-up view of the tool of FIG. 1 and the touch probe of FIG. 2a shown in a sixth position relative to each other.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a tool 10 for a turning machine is shown. The tool 10 includes a body 12 and a cutting portion 14 for use, for example, in in-turn or mill-turn machines, the machines also being known as lathes, CNC, turning machines etc. The cutting portion 14 has a cutting end 16. The tool 10 may be used to manufacture parts, such as metallic components, by carving out portions of the rotating part using the tool 10. The parts may then be used in a variety of industries including the aeronautics industry. In turning machines, the parts are cylindrical, revolve about their centerline with the tool 10 abutting on their external surface. The cutting end 16 of the tool 10 creates an indentation. As the tool 10 is moved deeper into the rotating part, material is removed from the part and various cut-outs and channels can be created. A position of the cut-out is predetermined in function of a desired shape of the part, and the tool 10 is moved by the turning machine in a precise fashion to accomplish the desired shape of the part. This is commonly known as grooving, and other operations are possible as well, such as facing and face grooving.

The cutting end 16 may have various shapes and be more or less sharp depending on the desired shape of the part. Whatever the sharpness of the cutting end 16, it includes a rounded portion at the tip. The rounded portion may be approximated by a portion of a circle C (a close-up view on the cutting end 16 showing the circle C is shown in FIG. 7a ). For smaller cut-outs where precision may be even more desired, an actual radius R of the cutting end 16 may be a desirable information. While a radius of the cutting end 16 may be obtained from a manufacturer of the cutting portion 14 (i.e. nominal value), there may be a discrepancy between the nominal value and the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16. This discrepancy may cause a discrepancy between the desired shape of the part and the obtained shape of the part.

In order to decrease a potential discrepancy between the nominal value and the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16, the tool 10 may be tested to determine the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16 prior to use on the part. The method by which the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16 is determined will be described below. The method includes the determination of coordinates of various points along the cutting end 16 using a touch probe.

Turning now to FIGS. 2a and 2b , FIG. 2a shows a first embodiment of a touch probe 22 for use in the determination of the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16. The touch probe 22 has a generally square cross-section with rounded corners and is shown in FIG. 2 in a top plan view (e.g. cubic shape, rectangular prism shape). The touch probe 22 includes at least four flat sides, namely sides 24, 26, 28, 30 and four rounded corners, namely corners 32, 34, 36, 38. The corners 32, 34, 36, 38 have a same radius of curvature, but it is contemplated that the corners 32, 34, 36, 38 could each have a different radius of curvature. Typically, the touch probe 22 deflects when touching an object. Touching one side 24, 26, 28, 30 or one corner 32, 34, 36, 38 gives a signal to the machine controller to record the actual positions. The touch probe 22 is linked to an electronic control unit (ECU) (not shown) which may record information every time the touch probe 22 sends a signal corresponding to one of the sides 24, 26, 28, 30 or corners 32, 34, 36, 38 being in physical contact with an object.

The touch probe 22 includes various sides 24, 26, 28, 30 and corners 32, 34, 36, 38 allowing the use of the touch probe 22 in a variety of direction and positions without having to greatly manipulate it, such as rotating it. With the use of the sides 24, 26, 28, 30 and corners 32, 34, 36, 38, the touch probe 22 could be used in at least 8 orientations of the tool 10 relative to the touch probe 22 in a 360° circumference.

The touch probe 22 shown in FIG. 2a is only one example of touch probe adapted for the below method of determining the radius R of the cutting end 16. FIG. 2b shows a second embodiment of a touch probe 22′ for use in the determination of the actual value of the radius R of the cutting end 16. The touch probe 22′ is similar to the touch probe 22 except that it features angled corners 32′, 34′, 36′, 38′ in place of rounded corners 32, 34, 36, 38 in between flat sides 24′, 26′, 28′, 30′. The angled corners 32′, 34′, 36′, 38′ are disposed at 45 degrees of the flat sides 24′, 26′, 28′, 30′. Other angular orientations of the angled corners 32′, 34′, 36′, 38′ are contemplated. It is contemplated that the touch probe 22 could yet have other shapes. For example, the touch probe 22 could have a triangular or rectangular cross-section instead of a square cross-section. The touch probe 22 could also have only one side.

Turning to FIG. 3, the tool 10 is shown in relation with the touch probe 22 for proceeding to the determination of the radius R of the cutting end 16. The touch probe 22 is used in a turning machine (not shown) with the tool 10 located as it would be to carve a part. It is however contemplated that the touch probe 22 and the tool 10 could be used outside of the turning machine to determine the radius R of the cutting end 16 of the tool 10. The turning machine has a fixed reference frame RF which defines a X-axis and an in-plane Z-axis. In the embodiment described in relation to the Figures, the touch probe 22 is oriented to have its sides 24, 26, 28, 30 aligned with the X- and Z-axes of the reference frame RF. The touch probe 22 and the tool 10 may move in a plane of the X- and Z-axes relative to one another.

The touch probe 22 allows determining coordinates of several points P₁, P₂, P₃ of the cutting end 16 (shown best in FIG. 7a ) relative to a reference point P₀ of the tool 10 to later calculate the radius R of the cutting end 16. In the embodiment described herein, the reference point P₀ is a fixed point of the tool 10 and is movable within the reference frame RF. An ECU (which may or may not be a same ECU as the one linked to the touch probe 22) records the position of the reference point P₀ at all times t: (P₀ ^(t)(X),P₀ ^(t)(Z)). From the position of the reference point P₀ at all times and coordinates of the touch probe 22 which may be known from calibration, can be deduced the coordinates of the points P₁, P₂, P₃ of the cutting end 16. As shown in FIG. 3, the tool 10 may use 3 different paths, namely path 1, path 2, path 3, to contact the touch probe 22 at three associated locations, in this embodiment sides 24, 26 and corner 32.

An out-of-plane Y-axis may also be defined, the X,Y,Z-axes forming together an orthogonal reference frame. The tool 10 has a reference point P₀ which allows determining a position of the tool 10 in the reference frame RF. In the example described herein, the touch probe 22 is fixed relative to the reference frame RF, while the tool 10 is movable relative to the reference frame RF. It is contemplated that the tool 10 could be fixed relative to the reference frame RF, while the touch probe 10 could be movable relative to the reference frame RF.

Turning now to FIGS. 4 to 8, a method 40 of determining the radius R of the cutting end 16 will be described. FIGS. 4 to 7 b show different positions of the tool 10 relative to the touch probe 22, and FIG. 8 is a flow chart with the different steps of the method 40.

The method 40 starts at step 42 by a contact between the tool 10 and the touch probe 22 at a first point P₂₄ having a known position on the X-axis and recording a coordinate of the reference point P₀ of the tool on the X-axis (FIG. 4).

Referring more specifically to FIGS. 3 and 4, a numerical command moves the tool 10 along the path 1 based on information obtained during calibration. Calibration information include a position of the side 24 in the reference frame RF on the X-axis, X₂₄. Motion of the tool 10 stops when the tool 10 contacts the side 24 of the touch probe 22. As the point P₁ of the cutting end 16 contacts the touch probe 22 (time t=t1) at point P₂₄, the touch probe 22 triggers an electrical signal which commands the tool 10 to stop its course. Coordinates of the reference point P₀ are then read and the X-coordinate of the reference point P₀, P₀ ^(t=t1)(X), is recorded by the ECU. The side 24 being aligned with the Z-axis, any point of the side 24 has a same X-coordinate X₂₄. Although the cutting end 16 is shown in FIG. 4 contacting a middle of the side 24 (i.e. point P₂₄), it should be understood that the cutting end 16 may contact any point along the side 24. It is also contemplated that the side 28 could have been used in place of the side 24 of the touch probe 22.

From the determination of P₀ ^(t=t1)(X), various values can be obtained. These values may be obtained by the ECU at step 42 or at a later step.

At time t=t1, the X-coordinate of the point P₁, P₁ ^(t=t1)(X) is equal to the X-coordinate X₂₄ of the point P₂₄.

From P₀ ^(t=t1)(X) and P₁ ^(t=t1)(X) can be deduced a position of the first point P₁ relative to the reference point P₀, i.e. an offset Off_(X) of the cutting end 16 on the X-axis. Off_(X) =P ₁ ^(t=t1)(X)−P ₀ ^(t=t1)(X)  (Eq. 1)

Since, at time t=t1, P₁ ^(t=t1)(X) is equal to X₂₄, Off_(X) =X ₂₄ −P ₀ ^(t=t1)(X)  (Eq. 2)

The offset Off_(X) may be used to deduce the radius R of the cutting end 16 in a below step.

The offset Off_(X) being known, the X-coordinate of the first point P₁ can be known at all times. P ₁ t(X)=P ₀ ^(t)(X)+Off_(X)  (Eq. 3)

When the value of P₀ ^(t=t1)(X) is recorded and optionally the value of the offset Off_(X) obtained at this step, the touch probe 22 is moved back to its original position shown in FIG. 3 so as to undo the contact between the touch probe 22 and the tool 10.

From step 42, the method 40 goes to step 44, to contact the touch probe 22 at a second point P₂₆ having a known position on the Z-axis and recording a coordinate of the reference point P₀ of the tool on the Z-axis.

Referring more specifically to FIG. 5, a numerical command moves the tool 10 along the path 2 based on information obtained during calibration. Calibration information include a position of the side 26 in the reference frame RF, Z₂₆. Motion of the tool 10 stops when the tool 10 contacts the side 26 of the touch probe 22. As the point P₂ of the cutting end 16 contacts the point P₂₆ of the touch probe 22 (time t=t2), the touch probe 22 triggers an electrical signal which commands the tool 10 to stop its course. Coordinates of the reference point P₀ are read and the Z-coordinate of the reference point P₀, P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z), is recorded by the ECU. The side 26 being aligned with the X-axis, any point of the side 26 has a same Z-coordinate Z₂₆. Although the cutting end 16 is shown in FIG. 5 contacting a middle of the side 26 (i.e. point P₂₆), it should be understood that the cutting end 16 may contact any point along the side 26. It is also contemplated that the side 30 could have been used in place of the side 26 of the touch probe 22.

From the determination of P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z), various values can be obtained. These values may be obtained by the ECU at step 44 or at a later step.

At time t=t2, the Z-coordinate of the point P₂, P₂ ^(t=t2)(Z) is equal to the Z-coordinate Z₂₆ of the point P₂₆.

From P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z) and P₂ ^(t=t2)(Z) can be deduced a position of the point P₂ relative to the reference point P₀, i.e. an offset Off_(Z) of the cutting end 16 on the Z-axis. Off_(Z) =P ₂ ^(t=t2)(Z)−P ₀ ^(t=t2)(Z)  (Eq. 4)

Since, at time t=t2, P₂ ^(t=t2)(Z) is equal to Z₂₆, Off_(Z) =Z ₂₆ −P ₀ ^(t=t2)(Z)  (Eq. 5)

The offset Off_(Z) may be used to deduce the radius R of the cutting end 16 in a below step.

The offset Off_(Z) being known, the Z-coordinate of the point P₂ can be known at all times.

When the value of P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z) is recorded and optionally the value of the offset Off_(Z) obtained at this step, the touch probe 22 is moved back to its original position shown in FIG. 3 so as to undo the contact between the touch probe 22 and the tool 10.

Steps 42 and 44 could be performed in any order, and by a same probe or two distinct probes.

From step 44, the method 40 goes to step 46, to contact the touch probe 22 at a third point P₃₂ having a known position on the X- and Z-axes and record a coordinate of the reference point P₀ of the tool on the X- and Z-axes. The point P₃₂ is not aligned with the sides 24 or 26, and as such has a X-coordinate different from the X-coordinate of the point P₂₄, and a Z-coordinate different from the Z-coordinate of the point P₂₆.

Referring more specifically to FIGS. 6, 7 a and 7 b, a numerical command moves the tool 10 along the path 3 based on information obtained during calibration and information obtained at steps 42 and 44. Calibration information includes a position of the point P₃₂, namely X₃₂, Z₃₂, in the reference frame RF and the numerical command moves the tool 10 to contact specifically the point P₃₂. The point P₃₂ is in a predetermined direction PD which is in-plane with the X- and Z-axes and at an angle α with respect to the X- and Z-axes. The angle α is determined at calibration. In one embodiment, the angle α is 45 degrees. Information obtained at steps 42 and 44 include Off_(x) and Off_(Z) which allow deducing the coordinates of a virtual cutting end point P_(CE), defined as the intersection of a line parallel to the X-axis passing through P₂ and a line parallel to the Z-axis passing through P₃. The numerical command includes travelling the point P_(CE) onto the predetermined direction PD.

Motion of the tool 10 stops when the point P₃ of the cutting end 16 contacts the point P₃₂ of the touch probe 22. As the tool 10 contacts the touch probe 22 at time t=t3, the touch probe 22 trigger and electrical signal which commands the tool 10 to stop its course. Coordinates of the reference point P₀ are read and the X- and Z-coordinates of the reference point P₀ ^(t=t3)(X), P₀ ^(t=t3)(Z) and recorded by the ECU. It is contemplated that the corners 34, 38 or 38 could have been alternatively used.

The coordinates of the reference point P₀ ^(t=t3)(X), P₀ ^(t=t3)(Z) may be used to deduce the radius R of the cutting end 16 in a below step.

From step 46, the method 40 goes to step 48, to determine the radius R of the cutting end 16 by the ECU.

As best seen in FIG. 7b , when the cutting end 16 contacts the corner 32 at the point P₃₂, the radius R may be obtained by: R=d(1+√{square root over (2)})  (Eq. 6)

when the angle α is 45°, d being a distance between third point P₃₂ and the virtual cutting end point P_(CE). The virtual cutting end point P_(CE) is defined as the intersection between a line parallel to the X-axis passing through the point P₂ with a line parallel to the Z-axis passing through the point P₁. d=√{square root over ((P _(CE) ^(t=t3)(X)−X ₃₂)²+(P _(CE) ^(t=t3)(Z)−Z ₃₂)²)}  (Eq. 7)

The cutting end point P_(CE) has a same X-coordinate as the first point P₁ and a same Z-coordinate as the second point P₂: P _(CE) ^(t=t3)(X)=P ₁ ^(t=t3)(X)=P ₀ ^(t=t3)(X)+Off_(X) P _(CE) ^(t=t3)(Z)=P ₂ ^(t=t3)(Z)=P ₀ ^(t=t3)(Z)+Off_(Z)  (Eq. 8)

Which leads to:

$\begin{matrix} {d = \sqrt{\left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(X)} + {Off}_{X} - X_{32}} \right)^{2} + \left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(Z)} + {Off}_{Z} - Z_{32}} \right)^{2}}} & \left( {{Eq}.\mspace{14mu} 9} \right) \end{matrix}$

From which the radius R is deduced as:

$\begin{matrix} {R = {\sqrt{\left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(X)} + {Off}_{X} - X_{32}} \right)^{2} + \left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(Z)} + {Off}_{Z} - Z_{32}} \right)^{2}}\left( {1 + \sqrt{2}} \right)}} & \left( {{Eq}.\mspace{14mu} 10} \right) \end{matrix}$

when the angle α is 45°. Determination of the radius R when the angle α is not 45° will be given below.

Step 46 could be performed by the same probe as steps 42 and/or 44 or by a distinct probe.

The above method relies on the knowledge of the parameters X₂₄, Z₂₆, X₃₂, Z₃₂, which may be determined during a calibration step prior to the method 40.

During calibration, a calibration tool having known dimensions is used. The calibration tool may or may not be similar to the tool 10. The calibration tool has the reference point P₀ which coordinates in the reference frame RF are recorded at all time. The cutting end of the calibration tool is brought into contact with the side 24, the X-coordinate of the reference point P₀ is recorded, and the X-coordinate X₂₄ is determined to be the sum of the X-coordinate of the reference point P₀ and a known distance between a point of the cutting end contacting the side 24 and the reference point P₀. Similarly, the cutting end of the calibration tool is brought in a second time into contact with the side 26, the Z-coordinate of the reference point P₀ is recorded, and the Z-coordinate Z₂₆ is determined to be the sum of the Z-coordinate of the reference point P₀ and a known distance between a point of the cutting end contacting the side 26 and the reference point P₀.

To calibrate the corner 32 and determine the parameters X₃₂, Z₃₂, the predetermined direction PD is first determined. In one embodiment, the predetermined direction PD is disposed at 45° from the X- and Z-axes. In other embodiment, the predetermined direction PD is disposed at an angle other than 45° from the X- and Z-axes.

With reference to FIG. 9, should the predetermined direction PD not be at 45°, the calibration process would define the radius PR of the arc A formed by the probe corner 32, 34, 36, 38 and the center coordinates PC of the arc A. The position of the contact point P₃₂ on the touch probe 20 may change according to the approach direction and the tool radius size. It may be identified by the calibration as for the case of 45°. When the tool touches the probe, the coordinate of PCE in X and Z directions are recorded. With reference to FIG. 9

${\begin{pmatrix} d_{z} \\ d_{x} \end{pmatrix} = {{PCE} - {PC}}},{d_{z} = {{PCE}_{z} - {PC}_{z}}},{and}$ d_(x) = PCE_(x) − PC_(x). The angular position of the contact point on the probe arc A depends on the tool radius size. From the geometry, when the probe is in contact with the cutting tool: (PR+R)²=(R+d _(z))²+(R+d _(x))²  (Eq. 11) The unknown parameter in this equation is the tool radius R. The solution of this equation gives TR as: R=(PR−d _(z) −d _(x))+√{square root over ((PR−d _(x) −d _(z))² +PR ² −d _(x) ² −d _(z) ²)}  (Eq. 12)

In the case of angle=450, as discussed above, geometrically we have: (R+d)²=(R)²+(R)²  (Eq. 13).

The solution of this equation gives TR as: R=d(1+√{square root over (2)}) where

$d = \sqrt{\left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(X)} + {Off}_{X} - X_{32}} \right)^{2} + \left( {{P_{0}^{t = {t\; 3}}(Z)} + {Off}_{Z} - Z_{32}} \right)^{2}}$ as discussed above.

Using the above method, relatively small radii R of the cutting end 16 such as the one commonly found in in-turn and mill-turn applications, can be determined. In one embodiment, the radius R is smaller than 0.1 inch. In one embodiment, the radius R is comprised between 0.01 and 0.1 inch. The above method may be carried within the turning machine which reduces a number of steps to determine the radius R. The relatively non-invasive method described above also allows determining the radius at any time before a turning operation without removing the tool 10 from the machine.

The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, the method could be used for tool not related to turning machines. The method could be used with any tool having an arcuate portion, and could preferably be used with tools of relatively small radii. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A system for determining a radius of a cutting end of a tool for a turning machine using a touch probe, the system comprising: an electronic control unit (ECU) executing instructions for: controlling movement of one of the cutting end and the touch probe relative to a reference frame having a first axis and a second axis, the one of the cutting end and the touch probe having a reference point trackable in the reference frame; recording at least: a first coordinate of the reference point on the first axis upon establishing contact between the touch probe and the cutting end at a first contact point having a known coordinate on the first axis, a second coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon establishing contact between the touch probe and the cutting end at a second contact point having a known coordinate on the second axis, a third coordinate of the reference point on the first axis upon establishing contact between the touch probe and the cutting end at a third contact point having known coordinates on the first and second axes, and a fourth coordinate of the reference point on the second axis upon establishing contact between the touch probe and the cutting end at the third contact point; determining a predetermined d erection from the coordinate of the first contact point on the first axis and the coordinate of the second contact point on the second axis, the one of the cutting end and the touch probe moving toward the third contact point along the predetermined direction; and determining the radius of the cutting end based on the first, second, third, and fourth coordinates.
 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the ECU further includes instructions for calculating: a first offset of an end point of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe relative to the reference point on the first axis based on the first coordinate; a second offset of the end point relative to the reference point on the second axis based on the second coordinate; and coordinates of the end point using the first and second offsets.
 3. The system according to claim 2, wherein the ECU further has instructions for calculating the coordinates of the end point by adding the first offset to the coordinate of the reference point along the first axis and by adding the second offset to the coordinate of the reference point along the second axis.
 4. The system according to claim 2, wherein the ECU further has instructions for determining the radius of the cutting end by multiplying a distance between the third contact point and the end point by (1+√(2) when movement of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe toward the third contact point is along a direction that is at 45 degrees from the first and second axes.
 5. The system according to claim 2, wherein: the first axis is an X-axis and the second axis is a Z-axis; a movement of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe toward the third contact point is along a direction that is at an angle of 45 degrees from the X-axis and the Z-axis, the reference point is P₀; the known coordinate of the first contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the X-axis is X₂₄; the first coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t1)(X), as established at t=t1; the known coordinate of the second contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the Z-axis is Z₂₆; the second coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z), as established at t=t2; the known coordinate of the third contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the X-axis is X₃₂; the third coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t3)(X), as established at t=t3; the known coordinate of the third contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the Z-axis is Z₃₂; the fourth coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t3)(Z), as established at t=t3; the ECU further has instructions for calculating the first offset that is Off_(x) by computing: Off_(x) =X ₂₄ −P ₀ ^(t=t1)(X); the ECU further has instructions for calculating the second offset that is Off_(z) by computing: Off_(z) =Z ₂₆ −P ₀ ^(t=t2)(Z); the ECU further has instructions for determining the radius by computing: R=(1+√(2))*[(P ₀ ^(t=t3)(X)+Off_(x) −X ₃₂)²+(P ₀ ^(t=t3)(Z)+Off_(z) −Z ₃₂)²]^(1/2).
 6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the ECU further has instructions for controlling movement of the cutting end relative to the touch probe that is fixed.
 7. The system according to claim 1, wherein the electronic control unit is within the turning machine.
 8. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the first axis is an X-axis and the second axis is a Z-axis; a movement of the one of the cutting end and the touch probe toward the third contact point is along a direction that is at an angle of 45 degrees from the X-axis and the Z-axis, the reference point is P₀; the known coordinate of the first contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the X-axis is X₂₄; the first coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t1)(X), as established at t=t1; the known coordinate of the second contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the Z-axis is Z₂₆; the second coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t2)(Z), as established at t=t2; the known coordinate of the third contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the X-axis is X₃₂; the third coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t3)(X), as established at t=t3; the known coordinate of the third contact point of the one of the cutting edge and the touch probe on the Z-axis is Z₃₂; the fourth coordinate is P₀ ^(t=t3)(Z), as established at t=t3; and the ECU further has instructions for determining the radius by computing: R=(1+√(2))*[P ₀ ^(t=t3)(X)−P ₀ ^(t=t1)(X)+X ₂₄ −X ₃₂)²+(P ₀ ^(t=t3)(Z)−P ₀ ^(t=t2)(Z)+Z ₂₆ −Z ₃₂)²]^(1/2).
 9. The system according to claim 1, configured for successively contacting the touch probe and the cutting end on the first, second, and third contact points in any order. 